Maryland Senators Oppose Selective Back Pay Bill, Push for Comprehensive Federal Worker Protection
October 27th, 2025 9:58 AM
By: Newsworthy Staff
Maryland Democratic senators Chris Van Hollen and Angela Alsobrooks opposed a Republican bill that would provide back pay only to essential federal workers during the government shutdown, instead advocating for comprehensive coverage for all affected employees and protections against firings.

Maryland's Democratic senators voted Thursday against a Republican proposal that would provide back pay only to certain essential federal workers during the ongoing government shutdown. The Shutdown Fairness Act, introduced by Senate Republicans, would pay federal law enforcement officers, Border Patrol agents, air traffic controllers and active troops during the shutdown while excluding other federal employees from immediate compensation.
Senator Chris Van Hollen strongly objected to the selective approach, arguing during Senate debate that "The best way to make sure that federal employees – all federal employees – get paid, and that the American people get the benefits of their services, is to reopen the government and do it now." Senator Angela Alsobrooks echoed this position, stating simply that "Our ask today is simple: pay them for the jobs that they were hired to do."
Van Hollen introduced an alternative measure, the True Shutdown Fairness Act, which would provide back pay for the entire furloughed workforce and prohibit firings of federal workers during government shutdowns. The bill has gained support from major federal employee unions including the American Federation of Government Employees and National Federation of Federal Employees. According to NFFE National President Randy Erwin, over 1 million employees will miss paychecks as the shutdown enters its fifth week, with many workers "picking up second jobs, filing for unemployment, and waiting in lines at food banks just to survive."
The debate featured sharp exchanges between Van Hollen and Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who sponsored the Republican version. Van Hollen called Johnson's bill "dangerous" and expressed concern about creating "a system where the president of the United States gets to decide what agencies to shut down...who to pay and who not to pay, who to punish, who to not punish." Johnson countered that he didn't "think we should limit the president's ability...to properly manage the federal government, and make the tough decisions, sometimes, to reduce the workforce."
Despite some openness to bipartisan cooperation, with Johnson noting "there's a lot of areas of agreement" and Van Hollen expressing willingness to "sit down with him and his team to see if we can put together a proposal," the Maryland senator ultimately opposed moving forward with the Shutdown Fairness Act. Van Hollen emphasized that "Our proposal doesn't discriminate among federal employees," highlighting the particular impact on Maryland, which is home to more than 160,000 federal employees.
The Republican back pay measure failed to reach the 60-vote threshold for passage, with a final tally of 54 in favor. Meanwhile, the House remains out of session on orders of Speaker Mike Johnson, who insists he will not negotiate with Democrats over terms of ending the shutdown. This leaves Congress without an immediate path to paying federal workers, though lawmakers could revisit other proposals, including Van Hollen's comprehensive approach, if talks resume next week.
Source Statement
This news article relied primarily on a press release disributed by citybiz. You can read the source press release here,
